Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856) 11 Ex Ch 781

You are here:
  • KB Home
  • Tort Law
  • Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856) 11 Ex Ch 781
< Back

Facts

  • Birmingham Waterworks Co were responsible for laying water pipes and other infrastructure around the Birmingham area
  • They installed a water main on the street where Blyth lived.
  • 25 years after it was installed, the water main sprung a leak due to extreme frost.
  • There was no evidence that Birmingham Waterworks Co had been negligent in installing or maintaining the water main.
  • Blyth, whose home was damaged by the leak, sued in negligence.

Issue

  • Was Birmingham Waterworks Company liable in negligence?

Held

  • No. The Court held that Birmingham Waterworks Co had done everything a reasonable person would have in the situation.
  • There was no negligence as there had been no breach of duty; it was simply an accident.

Significance

  • This case is famous for laying down the key principle of negligence, as evidenced by the below quote.

Quote

  • “Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” (Alderson)

Full text


-- Download Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856) 11 Ex Ch 781 as PDF --


FavoriteLoadingSave this case