# Viskauskas v Niland (1983) 153 CLR 280

You are here:
• Viskauskas v Niland (1983) 153 CLR 280
##### Facts
• Several Aboriginal Australian patrons were refused service at a bar.
• They brought proceedings under both state and federal anti-discrimination legislation.
• It was argued that the state law was inconsistent with the federal law, and thus invalid.
##### Issue
• Was there an inconsistency between the state and federal laws?
##### Held
• The court held that the state law was invalid.
• They held that the Federal Government had intended for the law to “cover the field” and thus it was inconsistent with the state law.
• They also held that the Federal law was validly made under the external affairs power of the Commonwealth.
##### Relevance/other notes
• This is a helpful case in applying the “cover the field” test.
• After this case, the federal government amended the Racial Discrimination Act to explicitly state that they did not intend for it to cover the field.